USPTO serial 78175618
T.U.B.A.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PIGNATELLO, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with T.U.B.A.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert W. Strozier
ROBERT W STROZIER ROBERT W STROZIER, PLLC2925 BRIARPARK DRSTE 930HOUSTON, TX 77042Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Medical services, namely, performing breast augmentation or reconstructive surgery or a trans-umbilical breast augmentation or reconstructive surgery by making an incision in the belly button, forming a subdermal channel to a position under the breast with an endoscope, forming a pocket of desired size under the breast with a tissue expander, inserting an implant in the pocket and filling the implant with a desired volume of liquid to achieve a desired breast augmentation or reconstruction | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 18, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 18, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 27, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 31, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 7, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |