USPTO serial 78175687
CERESTENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CERESTENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark A. Steiner,
MARK A STEINER TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLPTWO EMBARCADERO CTR 8TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3834UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical and surgical devices, namely, stents for arterial use. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MICRUS ENDOVASCULAR CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Micrus Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Micrus Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named CERESTENT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 1, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 7, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 13, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 8, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 6, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |