Drawing for KAU

USPTO serial 78175737

KAU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILLIS, PAMELA Y
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KAU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephanie Yost Cameron

STEPHANIE YOST CAMERON NEOPETS INC412 W BROADWAY AVE STE 300GLENDALE, CA 91204UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Toys, games and playthings, namely, toy vehicles, toy action figures and accessories for use therewith; dolls, doll clothing and doll accessories; children's multiple activity toys; plush toys; stuffed toys; plastic and vinyl toy characters; toy figures; radio-controlled toy vehicles; mechanical toys; wind-up toys; water squirting toys; musical toys; inflatable toys; jigsaw puzzles; game equipment sold as a unit for playing board, parlor, skill and action, card, role-playing games; hand-held electronic unit for playing video gamesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 31, 2007UNDRUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED—
Jul 11, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 11, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 12, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 26, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 26, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 25, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 25, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 25, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 26, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 26, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 26, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 8, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 19, 2005TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 19, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 19, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 26, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 3, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 14, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 12, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 27, 2004GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 3, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 3, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 27, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 1, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 19, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance