Drawing for ORANGE GLEAM

USPTO serial 78175951

ORANGE GLEAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLANDU, FLORENTINA
Law office
PRE-PUBLICATION FINAL REVIEW

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORANGE GLEAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey R. Cohen

Jeffrey R. Cohen Millen White Zelano & Branigan2200 Clarendon Blvd. Suite 1400Arlington, VA 22201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003LIQUID HOUSEHOLD CLEANER USED FOR REMOVING DIRT AND GREASEABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 8, 2005OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Dec 20, 2004ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Dec 17, 2004EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 6, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 3, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 13, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 6, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 6, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 6, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance