Drawing for THE PURPLE PILL

USPTO serial 78176056

THE PURPLE PILL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHANAHAN, PATRICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE PURPLE PILL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark I. Peroff

MARK I PEROFF KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART LLP599 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-6030UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of gastrointestinal diseases.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 5, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 5, 2004MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Oct 5, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 5, 2004EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 15, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2003GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 2, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance