USPTO serial 78176063
THE LEADER IN LOCUM TENENS STAFFING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 31, 2004
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE LEADER IN LOCUM TENENS STAFFING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CHG MARKETING AND TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
SALT LAKE CITY, UT
Other trademarks owned by CHG MARKETING AND TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
CHG MARKETING AND TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
SALT LAKE CITY, UT
Other trademarks owned by CHG MARKETING AND TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
CHS Therapy Technologies Corp.
Salt Lake City, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John C. Stringham
JOHN C STRINGHAM WORKMAN, NYDEGGER & SEELEY1000 EAGLE GATE TWR 60 E S TEMSALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Healthcare recruiting and staffing services | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CHG MARKETING AND TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by CHG MARKETING AND TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by CHS Therapy Technologies Corp.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named THE LEADER IN LOCUM TENENS STAFFING
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| May 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 5, 2008 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| May 5, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 14, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 18, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 18, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |