Drawing for GNF COMMERCIAL SYSTEMS

USPTO serial 78176202

GNF COMMERCIAL SYSTEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AWRICH, ELLEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GNF COMMERCIAL SYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marc M. Gorelnik, Esq.

MARC M GORELNIK ESQ TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLPTWO EMBARCADERO CTR 8TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3834UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Mechanical grippers, namely, two point robotic grippers for laboratory useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 15, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 15, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 15, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 13, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 21, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 1, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 28, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 25, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 18, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 18, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 18, 2005GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 18, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 12, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 30, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 27, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 14, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 25, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 18, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 23, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 22, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 14, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2003GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 30, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 3, 2003GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance