USPTO serial 78176264
ROAD ARMOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROAD ARMOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mountlake Terrace, WA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy B. McCormack
TIMOTHY B MCCORMACK MCCORMACK INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW BUSIMCCORMACK INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW BUSISEATTLE, WV 98109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Aftermarket fitted vehicle bumpers and hard tops | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 12, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |