Drawing for BETA PACIFIC FOOD INGREDIENTS

USPTO serial 78176725

BETA PACIFIC FOOD INGREDIENTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPRUILL, DARRYL M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BETA PACIFIC FOOD INGREDIENTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DELOS R. CLARK

MICHAEL A COHEN SCHWABE WILLIAMSON & WYATTSTE 19001211 SW FIFTH AVEPORTLAND, OR 97204

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035wholesale distributorship, import and export agency featuring commodities, namely, food and agricultural products, namely, peas, beans, lentils, popcorn, birdseed, fresh fruit and vegetables, seeds, edible oils, livestock feed, feed ingredients, namely, feed pellets, salt, corn and soybean meal, food supplements, food ingredients, namely, shortening and oils, chemical food additives phosphates, vital wheat gluten, dates and fruit bits, dehydrated potatoes and sesame seedsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 5, 2004MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 5, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 1, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 19, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 19, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 19, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 27, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 7, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 11, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 25, 2003GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 28, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance