Drawing for MALL COP

USPTO serial 78176963

MALL COP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOUGHRAN, BARBARA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MALL COP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jane Shay Wald, Esq.

JANE SHAY WALD ESQ IRELL & MANELLA LLP1800 AVE OF THE STARSSTE 900LOS ANGELES, CA 90067

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Prerecorded video tapes, audio tapes and cassettes, DVD's and compact discs featuring children's entertainment, comedy, drama and animationACTIVE—
016Books, namely, comic books, coloring books and story books, stickers; paper, namely gift wrapping paper, art paper, craft paper, note paper; and cards, namely, greeting cards, blank note cards, trading cardsACTIVE—
041Motion picture film production and entertainment in the nature of an on-going cable television program in the field of children's entertainment, comedy, drama and animation; entertainment in the nature of an on-going television series broadcast over television; entertainment services, namely, providing an on-going television program in the fields of children's entertainment, comedy, drama and animation via a global computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 13, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 13, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 9, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 19, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 13, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 5, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 13, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 20, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 31, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 14, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 2, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance