Drawing for NATURALLY FIT

USPTO serial 78177192

NATURALLY FIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HWANG, JOHN C B
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NATURALLY FIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey L. Van Hoosear

JEFFREY L VAN HOOSEAR KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP2040 MAIN ST 14TH FLIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009PRERECORDED TAPES, CDs AND DVDs ON EXERCISE, NUTRITION, WEIGHT MANAGEMENT, WEIGHT CONTROL, HEALTH, LIFESTYLE AND FITNESS; ELECTRONIC PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY, BOOK, MAGAZINE, MANUAL AND NEWSLETTER FEATURING EXERCISE, FITNESS, NUTRITION, WEIGHT LOSS AND LIFESTYLE TOPICS RECORDED ON COMPUTER MEDIAACTIVE—
016PRINTED EDUCATIONAL, INSTRUCTIONAL AND CONSULTATION MATERIALS, NAMELY, BOOK, MAGAZINE, MANUAL AND NEWSLETTER FEATURING EXERCISE, NUTRITION, WEIGHT LOSS, FITNESS, LIFESTYLE, RECIPESACTIVE—
041EXERCISE AND FITNESS CONSULTATION SERVICES; CONDUCTING CLASSES, CONFERENCES, WORKSHOPS AND SEMINARS FEATURING EXERCISE, FITNESS, NUTRITION, WEIGHT LOSS AND LIFESTYLE TOPICSACTIVE—
042PROVIDING CUSTOMIZED ON-LINE WEB PAGES FEATURING USER-DEFINED INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF EXERCISE, FITNESS, NUTRITION, WEIGHT LOSS AND LIFESTYLE TOPICS, WHICH INCLUDES SEARCH ENGINES AND ON-LINE WEB LINKS TO OTHER WEB SITESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 11, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 11, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 11, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 6, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 6, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 2, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 9, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 20, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 9, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 19, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 12, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 7, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance