USPTO serial 78177236
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
92100 Boulogne, FR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Checking and security apparatus and instruments for computers and computer peripherals, namely; computer alarms; computer software designed to prevent viruses; computer software designed to ensure proper access; CD-ROM and DVD burners for computers | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, electronic transmission of messages and coded images; electronic transmission of message and data; wireless digital messaging services; electronic store-and-forward messaging, electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals, correspondence exchange services, namely exchange of computerized documents, computer telecommunication, facsimile transmission, electronic mail services, telephone communication services; electronic electric and digital transmission over a global communication of voice, data, images, signals and messages contained in data banks, image banks, and computer servers; communication services, namely transmitting sound and audio-visual recordings via the Internet; providing multiple user access to a global computer information network; providing telecommunications connection to a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Rental of computers and software; maintenance of computer software; emergency maintenance service for data processing equipment; updating of computer software; providing of access time to a data base server; consultancy in the field of computer hardware; computer programming for others; maintenance of data bases; consultancy in the field of computer security, creating and designing websites for others; exploition of data bases; data processing services; custom design of computer programs | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 11, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 1, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |