USPTO serial 78177262
ISOBAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HWANG, JOHN C B
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ISOBAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Santa Rosa, CA
Santa Rosa, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | resistance exercise machines | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 21, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 21, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 4, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |