USPTO serial 78177402
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
North Canton, OH
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas R. Kingsbury
THOMAS R KINGSBURY THE HOOVER COMPANY101 E MAPLE STNORTH CANTON, OH 44720UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Floor care appliances, namely, vacuum cleaners | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 29, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 29, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2004 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 15, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |