Drawing for TWIN CHAMBER

USPTO serial 78177402

TWIN CHAMBER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TWIN CHAMBER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas R. Kingsbury

THOMAS R KINGSBURY THE HOOVER COMPANY101 E MAPLE STNORTH CANTON, OH 44720UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Floor care appliances, namely, vacuum cleanersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 31, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 29, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 29, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 21, 2005EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 17, 2005GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jan 27, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2004GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 15, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 15, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 18, 2003GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 24, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 27, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance