Drawing for MOISTURE GLOVE

USPTO serial 78177421

MOISTURE GLOVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MOISTURE GLOVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lesley A. Moradian

LESLEY A MORADIAN THE ESTEE LAUDER COMPANIES INC767 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10153UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Skin care preparations, namely hand lotions and creams.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 8, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 5, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 5, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 13, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2004EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 25, 2004GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
May 11, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 11, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 11, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 8, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 29, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 6, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 25, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance