Drawing for SURETRAK

USPTO serial 78177680

SURETRAK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINK, GINA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SURETRAK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marjorie R. Esman

MARJORIE R ESMAN MILLING BENSON WOODWARD LLP909 POYDRAS ST STE 2300NEW ORLEANS, LA 70112UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Goods made primarily from paper and cardboard, namely, biological sample collection devices comprising paper or cardboard sheet material having a portion overlaid with plastic film to allow for securement of a biological sample beneath said film and albums for storing biological sample collection devicesACTIVE—
035Computerized database management and data processing services, namely, compilation of information into computer databases and computer tracking and matching services, namely, compilation of information on biological samples into computer databases and tracking and matching of these samples to identify the animal from which a meat sample originated through matching of biological samples collected both from the animal and the meat sampleACTIVE—
042Chemical and biochemical analysis including analysis, sequencing and identification of DNA from biological samples; and professional consultancy services in the field of chemical and biochemical analysis of biological samplesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 12, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 28, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 5, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 5, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 5, 2004ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 5, 2004REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 4, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 14, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 27, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 23, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 6, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 1, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance