USPTO serial 78177687
BRUGGER + THOMET AG SWITZERLAND B&T
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEIPZIG, MARC J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BRUGGER + THOMET AG SWITZERLAND B&T?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James Michael Faier
JAMES MICHAEL FAIER FAIER & FAIER PC566 W ADAMS STSTE 600CHICAGO, IL 60661Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical defense products, namely, mace and pepper spray. | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Optical lens sight; telescopic lens sight; telescopic laser sights and optical laser sights | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Orthopedic implants made of metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 013 | Firearms, namely, pistols, guns and rifles; noise suppressors for firearms; silencers for firearms; gun and rifle parts and accessories, namely, handguards, tactical lights to be attached to and for use in connection with firearms, universal ammunition mounts, sight mounts, flashhiders, upper and lower receivers, stocks, barrels, laser sights namely non-optical and non-telescopic open sights for use on firearms, bipods, side rails, foregrips; sight lens namely non-optical and non-telescopic open sight for use on firearms | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail services featuring armaments; wholesale distributorships featuring armaments; consulting on purchase of weapons and armaments for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Education services, namely, conducting classes, workshops and seminars in the fields of tactical use of weapons and anti-riot and anti-terrorist equipment; providing training regarding the tactical use of weapons and anti-riot and anti-terrorist equipment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Brugger + Thomet AG
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 013
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named BRUGGER + THOMET AG SWITZERLAND B&T
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 2, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 27, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 15, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |