Drawing for WHITEFIRE

USPTO serial 78177742

WHITEFIRE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WHITEFIRE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jane Shay Wald, Esq.

JANE SHAY WALD ESQ IRELL & MANELLA LLP1800 AVE OF THE STARSSTE 900LOS ANGELES, CA 90067

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Wireless communication hardware, namely radio transmitters, radio receivers, data reproduction devices, namely, video monitors, loudspeakers; and computer software for the transmission, reception and reproduction of data signals; audio and video equipment namely, wireless loudspeakers, video monitors, cameras, and remote controls for radios and partsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 31, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 31, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 19, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 7, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 3, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 3, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 31, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 12, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 12, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 9, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 21, 2004DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 29, 2004DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 25, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 2, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 11, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 29, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 5, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance