Drawing for VUSCAPE

USPTO serial 78178532

VUSCAPE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMIGA, HOWARD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VUSCAPE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Janis M. Manning, Esquire

JANIS M MANNING ESQ C/O CHRISTIAN R ANDERSEN 600 HIDDEN RIDMAILCODE HQE03H01VERIZON CORPORATE SERVICES GROUP INCIRVING, TX 75038

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Local hotel computer network services comprising pay-per-view cable television transmission and providing high speed access to a global computer networkACTIVE—
041In-room television programming services to guests; entertainment in the nature of online gaming servicesACTIVE—
042Local hotel network services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for guest room climate control and for obtaining information on local area attractions via a global computer network that is interfaced by interactive televisionACTIVE—
045Online concierge services for others comprising making requested personal arrangements and reservations and providing customer-specific information to meet individual needs rendered together for local businessesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 20, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 20, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 17, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 25, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 5, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 5, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 29, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 26, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 26, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 1, 2005GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 1, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 3, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 22, 2005CWBPWITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION—
Jan 25, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 18, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 10, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 10, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 10, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 19, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 10, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 4, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 26, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 9, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 10, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 17, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 31, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance