Drawing for SEAL-SCAN

USPTO serial 78178588

SEAL-SCAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2918019Status 800Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 11, 2005
Examiner
CARROLL, DORITT
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with SEAL-SCAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan E. Clady

Susan E. Clady Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff LLP127 Public SquareSuite 4900Cleveland, OH 44114

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009SEAL INTEGRITY INSPECTION SYSTEM, NAMELY, OPTO-ACOUSTIC APPARATUS THAT FOCUSES SOUND WAVES, PRINCIPALLY COMPRISING TRANSDUCERS, RECEIVERS, SIGNAL GENERATORS, COMPUTERS AND SOFTWARE FOR OPTO-ACOUSTIC IMAGING FOR INSPECTING FILLED AND SEALED POUCHES, TRAYS, BLISTERS, PACKAGES, AND CUPS TO VERIFY SEAL INTEGRITY AND TO DETECT COMMON DEFECTS SUCH AS LACK OF HEAT SEAL, MISPLACED LIDDING OR TOP WEB LAYER OR FAULTS ALONG THE HEAT SEAL WIDTH SUCH AS CHANNEL VOIDS, CONTAMINANTS, AND INCLUSIONSACTIVEJun 17, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 29, 2025NURCNOTICE OF UPDATED REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED—
Feb 13, 2025ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Feb 11, 2025COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Feb 9, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 19, 2024E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2024ES7RTEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2024REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2014NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2014RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Feb 21, 201489AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Feb 20, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 6, 201489AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Feb 6, 2014E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2010C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 27, 2010APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 16, 2010815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Feb 16, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 3, 2004REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 3, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 3, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 15, 2004CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Oct 1, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 2004SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 14, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 6, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 17, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 10, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 17, 2003EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 6, 2003GNRUDISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2003AAUDAMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED—
Sep 10, 2003AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 21, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 31, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 31, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 28, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance