Drawing for CRFSCAN

USPTO serial 78178693

CRFSCAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KON, ELISSA GARBER
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRFSCAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER CASE REPORT FORM MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE THAT ALLOWS USERS TO CONVERT CRF FILES INTO PORTABLE DOCUMENT FORMAT KNOW AS PDF THAT CAN BE REVIEWED THROUGH INTRANET OR INTERNET SITE, AND THAT INDEXES, RETRIEVES AND MANAGES SUCH FILESACTIVEOct 17, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 13, 2005PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Mar 15, 2005PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Feb 7, 2005PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Sep 24, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2004FAXXFAX SENT—
Jul 16, 2004FAXXFAX SENT—
Jul 15, 2004UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jul 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 6, 2003GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 15, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 18, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2003FAXXFAX SENT—
Jul 22, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance