USPTO serial 78178701
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Clayton, Victoria, AU
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John M. Kim
MICHAEL D FISHMAN RADER, FISHMAN & GRAUER PLLCSTE 14039533 WOODWARD AVEBLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | custom peptides, synthetic organic compounds and libraries (diverse collections) thereof for scientific and research use; materials for solid phase synthesis of peptides and synthetic organic compounds comprising microtiter plates, treated support units, a block arrangement of support units, attachments for identification of treated supported units, equipment for manipulation of treated support units, reaction trays, chemical solutions and reagents, a software program and technical manuals sold together as a unit (kit) or separately as components | ACTIVE | Nov 8, 1989 |
| 042 | scientific research and development of scientific products for others | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |