Drawing for RIVETED BY LEE

USPTO serial 78178720

RIVETED BY LEE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WOOD, CAROLINE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RIVETED BY LEE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Helen L. Winslow

HELEN L WINSLOW THE H D LEE COMPANY INC3411 SILVERSIDE RDWILMINGTON, DE 19810UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Shoe shine kits comprised of shoe polishes and brushesACTIVE—
008Manicure setsACTIVE—
009CD holders, contact lens holders and cell phone casesACTIVE—
016Pocket secretaries containing a calendar, note paper and/or calculatorACTIVE—
018Articles made of leather; namely, credit card cases, business card cases, wallets, hipster style wallets, travel bags sold empty, backpacks; non-metal key cases and leather passport casesACTIVE—
020Non-metal money clips made of leather and key fobs, made of leatherACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, belts and suspendersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 26, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 26, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 23, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 23, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 25, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 25, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 25, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 27, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 2, 2004TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 2, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 2, 2004PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 27, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 19, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 19, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 25, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 2, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 13, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 1, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 25, 2003GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 22, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 17, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance