USPTO serial 78179238
PROCESS800
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3265608Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 17, 2007
- Examiner
- COLEMAN, CIMMERIAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PROCESS800?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael G. O'Neil, Jr.
MICHAEL G ONEIL JR ATTORNEY AT LAW462 PLAIN ST STE 203MARSHFIELD, MA 02050UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, namely, programs for Enterprise Resource Planning, namely, software for linking together systems in the field of manufacturing, finance, human resources, sales force automation, data warehousing, document management, after-sales service and support to enhance process manufacturing functionality in the nature of process flow control, unit of measure in volume, weight and density, lot control, lot tracking, formulatization, batch ticket, equipment constraint, critical material, quality control, bill of lading, scheduling, and instruction manuals sold as a unit therewith | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Myers Nissi & Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Myers Nissi & Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Myers Nissi & Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named PROCESS800
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 2, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 5, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 16, 2006 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 3, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 23, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 11, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 21, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 9, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |