Drawing for SIDES IN SECONDS

USPTO serial 78179332

SIDES IN SECONDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLAYTON, CHERYL A
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIDES IN SECONDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Arlen L. Olsen

ARLEN L OLSEN SCHMEISER, OLSEN & WATTS22 CENTURY HILL DR STE 302LATHAM, NY 12110UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Processed foods, namely, potatoes, vegetables and fruitsACTIVE—
030Processed foods, namely, pasta and riceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 28, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 21, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 8, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 8, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 8, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 8, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 1, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 1, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 26, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 26, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 26, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 26, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 26, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 14, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 22, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 2, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 23, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 23, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 11, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance