Drawing for SEAMATION

USPTO serial 78179394

SEAMATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOHR, AMY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SEAMATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lori Krafte

LORI KRAFTE GREENEBAUM DOLL & MCDONALD PLLC2800 CHEMED CTR255 E FIFTH STCINCINNATI, OH 45202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Marine and land-based navigational apparatus and equipment, namely, sonar fish finders, radar, chart plotters and VHF radios; global positioning systems consisting of computers, computer software, transmitters, receivers, and network interface devices; electrical and electronic equipment, namely, GPS antennas, receivers and sensors; satellites and satellite communications apparatus and equipment, namely, satellite telephones and satellite processors; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods; computer hardware; operational software used to operate GPS systems, sonar fish finders, radar, chart plotters, depth sounders and VHF radios; computer software for operating mobile communication devices; computer software for operating entertainment systems consisting of televisions, radios, DVD and video players and recorders; computer software for operating security and safety systems consisting of alarms and warning devices; computer software that enables the user to track or locate marine and land based vehicles, namely, fleet tracking and vehicular locator software; and computer software that operates all the foregoing systems in one complete systemACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 28, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 28, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 28, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 5, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 16, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 8, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 8, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 23, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 16, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2004GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 28, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 17, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 17, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 6, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 6, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 7, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
May 7, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 28, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance