Drawing for PRINCE PHILIP

USPTO serial 78179468

PRINCE PHILIP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ADKINS, CHRISTOPHER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRINCE PHILIP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott Greenberg,

SCOTT GREENBERG MORGAN & FINNEGAN, LLP345 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10154UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
034CigarsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 26, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 26, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
May 26, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 26, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 12, 2004LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
Nov 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2004RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jul 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 17, 20031.AASEC. 1(A) CLAIM ADDED—
Oct 20, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 20, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance