Drawing for FRANCO SARTO

USPTO serial 78179639

FRANCO SARTO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRANCO SARTO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michelle P. Foxman

MICHELLE P FOXMAN FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025socks and hosieryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 28, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 28, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 19, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 24, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 3, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 23, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 23, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 18, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 18, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 18, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 18, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 29, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 9, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 5, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 28, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 28, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 23, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 23, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance