USPTO serial 78179676
RB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRUM MILONE, MARCIE R
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karen K. Hammond
KAREN K HAMMOND PORTER, WRIGHT, MORRIS & ARTHUR41 S HIGH ST 28TH FLCOLUMBUS, OH 43215-6194UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | HAND-OPERATED TOOLS; NAMELY, SCOOPS IN THE NATURE OF HAND SHOVELS, SHOVELS, SPADES, SIDEWALK AND BARN FLOOR SCRAPERS, GARDEN TROWELS AND CULTIVATORS, POSTHOLE DIGGERS, SOIL AUGERS, RAKES, HOES, FORKS, HOOKS, NAMELY, GRASS HOOKS, WEED HOOKS, GARBAGE/MANURE HOOKS, AND POTATO HOOKS, VEGETATION KNIVES AND SHEARS, PRUNING TOOLS, PRUNING SAWS, LAWN WEEDERS, SOD LIFTERS, WEED CUTTERS, GRASS TRIMMERS, BULB PLANTERS, MATTOCKS, PICKS, WOOD-SPLITTING WEDGES, MAULS, HEAVY HAMMERS, SLEDGE HAMMERS, TAMPERS, CROW BARS, TAMPING BARS, WRECKING BARS, SNOW SHOVELS, AND SNOW PUSHERS | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 17, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 2005 | SPRA | SU - PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | SPRA | SU - PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 3, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 11, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |