Drawing for SPOKE BLAZERS

USPTO serial 78180209

SPOKE BLAZERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELL, MARLENE D
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPOKE BLAZERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
01212. bicycle, motorcycle and wheel chair spoked wheelsACTIVEMar 21, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 11, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Apr 10, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 16, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 10, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 10, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 27, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 12, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 2, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 3, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 6, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance