USPTO serial 78180218
MASTER PART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MASTER PART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | automotive parts, namely-- hoods, bumper covers, steel bumpers, gas tanks | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 27, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |