Drawing for WANNADO

USPTO serial 78180297

WANNADO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPARACINO, MARK V
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WANNADO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JEFFREY A. SMITH

JEFFREY A SMITH MILLEN, WHITE, ZELANO & BRANIGAN, PC2200 CLARENDON BLVD STE 1400ARLINGTON, VA 22201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025T-shirts, sweatshirts, hats, sweatpants, sweat suits, polo shirts, shorts, jerseys, shirts, pants, headbands, footwearACTIVE—
028Toys and games, namely, mechanical toys; electric action toys; playground balls; rubber action balls; sport balls; action figures and accessories therefor; dolls and accessories therefore; plush toys; balloons; manipulative games; hand held unit for playing electronic games; puzzles; toy vehicles and accessories therefore; toy model walkie-talkies; board games; magic tricks, musical toys; party games; parlor games; battery-powered computer game with LCD screen which features animation and sound effects; arcade-type electronic education video games; coin-operated video games; hand held unit for playing video games; stand alone video game machines; stand alone video output game machinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 5, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 5, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 6, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 14, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 14, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 30, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 17, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 17, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 16, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 16, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 16, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 27, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 11, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 11, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 25, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 2, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 2, 2004DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 18, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 18, 2004DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 18, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 24, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 4, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 17, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 16, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 19, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 19, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance