USPTO serial 78180301
AQUA SOYA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AQUA SOYA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. MacDermott
MICHAEL J MACDERMOTT CHRISTIE PARKER & HALE LLPPO BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS; SOY ISOFLAVONES FOR USE AS NUTRITIONAL INGREDIENTS IN POWDERED AND READY TO DRINK OR EAT BEVERAGES AND FOODSTUFFS; DIETARY AND NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS IN THE FORM OF BEVERAGE MIXES; NUTRITIONAL DRINK MIXES FOR USE AS A MEAL REPLACEMENT; INGREDIENTS OF FOOD AND BEVERAGES IN THE NATURE OF NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | SOY-BASED FOOD BEVERAGES USED AS A MILK SUBSTITUTE; SOY-BASED FOOD BEVERAGES USED AS A MILK SUBSTITUTE AND CONTAINING SOY ISOFLAVONES; SOY-BASED FOOD BEVERAGES NOT USED AS A MILK SUBSTITUTE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AQUA SOYA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by AQUA SOYA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by AquaSoya, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named AQUA SOYA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 14, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 23, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 3, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |