USPTO serial 78180385
INTUITIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTUITIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dianne M. Camelo
DIANNE M CAMELO LEVY, STOPOL & CAMELO LLP1425 EAB PLZUNIONDALE, NY 11556-1425UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Remote controllers for electronic devices, namely televisions, stereos, home theatres, window blinds and curtains, air conditioners, home appliances, thermostats heaters and home lighting, but not for use with computers or for accessing the internet, except to download music | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AUDIOVOX ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Terk Technologies Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Terk Technologies Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named INTUITIVE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 5, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 16, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 31, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 5, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 5, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 9, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 29, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 9, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 28, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |