USPTO serial 78180483
INDIANA'S ONLY COMPREHENSIVE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, RONALD G
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INDIANA'S ONLY COMPREHENSIVE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas Q. Henry
THOMAS Q HENRY WOODARD, EMHARDT, NAUGHTON, MORIARTY & M3700 BANK ONE CTR TWR111 MONUMENT CIRINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Medical and health care services; hospitals; medical clinics; conducting clinical trials of medicines and medical procedures; counseling in the field of healthcare, medicine and hospital care | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 10, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 18, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |