Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78180540?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78180540. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns DOUBLE REDUCER?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78180540, the listed owner(s) include: Rosemount Inc..

What is USPTO serial number 78180540?

Serial number 78180540 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark DOUBLE REDUCER. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of DOUBLE REDUCER?

DOUBLE REDUCER (78180540) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover DOUBLE REDUCER?

The public record lists International Classes: 009. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 78180540

DOUBLE REDUCER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Oct 31, 2002
Status date: Jun 2, 2008
Registration date: —
Examiner: LITZAU, MICHAEL
Law office: TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DOUBLE REDUCER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Rosemount Inc.
Eden Prairie, MN
Other trademarks owned by Rosemount Inc.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Judson K. Champlin

JUDSON K CHAMPLIN WESTMAN, CHAMPLIN & KELLY900 2ND AVE S STE 1400MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
009	FLOW METERS USED FOR MEASURING FLOW THROUGH PIPES; VORTEX FLOW METERS	ACTIVE	Feb 28, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Jun 12, 2008	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Jun 2, 2008	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Jun 2, 2008	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Feb 27, 2008	EXPA	EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED	—
Jul 10, 2007	GNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED	—
Jul 10, 2007	CNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED	—
Jun 27, 2007	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Jun 4, 2007	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
May 21, 2007	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Nov 4, 2006	GECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Nov 4, 2006	CFRC	SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	—
Nov 4, 2006	IUAA	USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED	—
Oct 16, 2006	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Oct 11, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Oct 11, 2006	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 11, 2006	GPRA	PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED	A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 11, 2006	CPRA	PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN	A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 21, 2006	AUPC	AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE	—
Mar 21, 2006	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Mar 16, 2006	IUAF	USE AMENDMENT FILED	—
Mar 16, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Mar 16, 2006	EAAU	TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED	—
Mar 16, 2006	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 9, 2006	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
Sep 20, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 2005	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Jul 21, 2005	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
May 10, 2005	RECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED	—
May 10, 2005	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Apr 20, 2005	ATRQ	ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED	—
Apr 12, 2005	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 12, 2005	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Apr 12, 2005	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Apr 12, 2005	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Oct 15, 2004	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 14, 2004	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 4, 2003	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Nov 3, 2003	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Nov 3, 2003	FAXX	FAX RECEIVED	—
May 2, 2003	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2003	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—