Drawing for POPCORN PEPPER JACK

USPTO serial 78180693

POPCORN PEPPER JACK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WELLS, KELLEY L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 600: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with POPCORN PEPPER JACK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patricia Jones, Reg. No. 46,318

DANIEL E KATTMAN ESQ REINHART BOERNER VAN DEUREN SCSTE 21001000 N WATERMILWAUKEE, WI 53202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029cheese, breaded cheese appetizersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 19, 2004ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Aug 19, 2004GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 20, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 17, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 28, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance