USPTO serial 78180982
ENTERYX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENTERYX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Wayne A. Sivertson
WAYNE A SIVERTSON NAWROCKI, ROONEY & SIVERTSON, PA3433 BROADWAY ST NESTE 401 BROADWAY PL EMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55413Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Apparatus and biocompatible polymer for use in treating fecal incontinence | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Mar 19, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |