Drawing for ICC CRICKET WORLD CUP SOUTH AFRICA 2003 INTERNATIONAL CRICKET COUNCIL

USPTO serial 78181003

ICC CRICKET WORLD CUP SOUTH AFRICA 2003 INTERNATIONAL CRICKET COUNCIL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ICC CRICKET WORLD CUP SOUTH AFRICA 2003 INTERNATIONAL CRICKET COUNCIL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan Upton Douglass

SUSAN UPTON DOUGLASS FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016printer matter; books, programs, score cards, magazines, comics, activity books, pop-up books, posters, banners, flags, wrapping paper, gift tags, photographs, stationery, notepaper, envelopes, pens, pencils, pencil cases, writing cases, paper napkins and tablecloths, promotional materials, tickets, program flyers, packaging material instructional and teaching materials, playing cards, coasters, tablemats, stickers, transfers, tattoos, calendars, diaries, notebooks, tissues, paper handkerchiefs, folders, erasers, pencil tops, pencil sharpeners, crayons, felt-tip pens, greeting cards, plastic bags, carrier bags, parts, fittings and accessories for the aforesaid goodsACTIVE—
025clothing; headwear; footwearACTIVE—
028sporting articles; toys and playthings; party hats, parts, fittings and accessories for the aforementioned goodsACTIVE—
038telecommunication servicesACTIVE—
041organization of sporting activities; organization and provision of education, training and development in relation to sports, provision of information relating to sports activitiesACTIVE—
043providing food and drink, restaurant services, hotel services, temporary accommodationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 14, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 16, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 22, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance