Drawing for BIZFLASH

USPTO serial 78181039

BIZFLASH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BURNS, ELLEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIZFLASH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thilo C. Agthe

THILO C AGTHE WUERSCH & GERING LLP11 HANOVER SQ 19TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software, namely, a messaging application which enables businesses to send information in the form of audio, video, graphical and textual data over the Internet directly to customers; communications software, namely, instant messaging software for sending messages between users connected to each other via Intranets, LANs or the InternetACTIVE—
042Application Service Provider (ASP) providing Internet-based access to a messaging application which enables businesses to send information in the form of audio, video, graphical and textual data over the Internet directly to customers; providing technical support to users of that softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Aug 29, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 29, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 27, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 4, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 11, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 8, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 27, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 23, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 9, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 1, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 6, 2003GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 25, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 19, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance