USPTO serial 78181726
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
M. Hope Aguilar
M HOPE AGUILAR ARVIC SEARCH SERVICES INCSTE 280 521 3RD AVE SWCALGARY, AB T2P 3T3CANADA| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Conducting workshops and seminars in business development namely; A Copyrighted Business Development Program consisting of a series of 8 modules dealing with the fundamental elements of business Each module consists of a program manual covering a specific subject Upon familiarizing one self with the contents of the manual, the client is compelled to apply the material from the program manual to actually doing the exercises that relate to the manual, that are contained in a workbook relating to the subject The program, is a hybrid, involving self learning which is augmented with interactive involvement from a business consultant, who provides support and guidance as the client progresses towards starting a new business, or improving an existing one The support is of a tutorial nature, dealing one-on-one | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2002 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |