USPTO serial 78181744
Serial No. 78181744
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUPP, TERRY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 78181744?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID E ROGERS
DAVID E ROGERS SQUIRE SANDERS & DEMPSEY LLP2 RENAISSANCE SQ STE 270040 N CENTRAL AVEPHOENIX, AZ 85004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Board games for financial education | ACTIVE | Dec 10, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 22, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 5, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |