Drawing for BABY TAIPAN

USPTO serial 78181976

BABY TAIPAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KELLY, JOHN M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BABY TAIPAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Apolzon

LAWRENCE E APOLZON FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK NY, 10017U.S. ARMY

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Crockery, namely plates, cups, saucers, mugs, bowls, dishes, drinking glasses, salt and pepper shakers, vasesACTIVE—
024Bed linen, bed covers, bedspreads, bed blankets, pillowcases, quilts, duvets covers, table cloths not of paper, table linen, table napkins not of paper, textile place mats, fabric table runners, handkerchiefs, curtainsACTIVE—
025dresses, skirts, blouses, jackets, coats, trousers, shirts, t-shirts, cardigans, jumpers, jerseys, ties, waistcoats, scarves, underwear, pajamas, night dresses, bath robes, gloves, swimsuits, shoes, boots, slippersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 12, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 10, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 12, 2005CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 12, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 20, 2004RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 26, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 16, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 18, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 17, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 14, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 14, 2003REINREINSTATED—
Oct 31, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 17, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 4, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance