Drawing for PRO SUPREME

USPTO serial 78182005

PRO SUPREME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SINGLETON, RUDY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRO SUPREME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William H. Logsdon, Registration No. 22,132

WILLIAM H LOGSDON REGISTRATION NO 22 WEBB ZIESENHEIM LOGSDON ORKIN & HANSON700 KOPPERS BLDG 436 SEVENTH AVEPITTSBURGH PA, 15219 1818U.S. ARMY

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002Coating compositions in the nature of paint, namely, interior and exterior paint.ACTIVE—
016Paint applicators, namely, paint brushes, paint roller covers and paint pads.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 14, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 14, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 14, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2004EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 16, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 15, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 4, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 9, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 4, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance