Drawing for SMART CAREGIVER

USPTO serial 78182083

SMART CAREGIVER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMART CAREGIVER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Craig M. Stainbrook

Craig M. Stainbrook Stainbrook & Stainbrook, LLP412 Aviation Blvd., Ste. HSanta Rosa, CA 95403UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009PATIENT SAFETY MONITORS, NAMELY MONITORS WHICH ATTACH TO BEDS, CHAIRS, WHEELCHAIRS, SEATBELTS, WRISTS AND ANKLES, AND PENDANT MONITORS WHICH ARE USED TO ALERT CAREGIVERS TO EMERGENCIESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 19, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 20, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 18, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 18, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 4, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance