Drawing for RADICAL TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 78182121

RADICAL TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RADICAL TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rod A. Rigole, Esq.

Rod A. Rigole Vivendi Games, Inc.6060 Center Drive, 5th floorLos Angeles, CA 90045UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009operating system software; operating system software for accessing global computer and communication networks; computer software for playing video games, computer games, digital games, and interactive games; computer game software, video game software, digital game software and interactive game software; computer game software, video game software, digital game software and interactive game software that is downloadable from computer and communication networks; computer software for developing computer games, video games, digital games, and interactive games; computer software for the design, creation and rendering of three dimensional graphics; instruction and user manuals supplied as a unit with the foregoingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 5, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 5, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 24, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 10, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 10, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 10, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 10, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 28, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 6, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 6, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 27, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 27, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 27, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 5, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 28, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 28, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 28, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 28, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 28, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 28, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 25, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 5, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 15, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 10, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 5, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 5, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 30, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 24, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 9, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 2, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance