Drawing for THINK SHRINK

USPTO serial 78182176

THINK SHRINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BOULTON, KELLY F
Law office
PRE-PUBLICATION FINAL REVIEW

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THINK SHRINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Glenn F. Ostrager

JOSHUA S BROITMAN OSTRAGER CHONG FLAHERTY & BROITMAN PC250 PARK AVE STE 825NEW YORK, NY 10177-0899UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
040manufacture and printing of heat shrink labels and tamper-evident seals for othersABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 14, 2005ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jan 13, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 28, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 9, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 9, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 9, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance