Drawing for BANKING WITH CONFIDENCE

USPTO serial 78182271

BANKING WITH CONFIDENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BANKING WITH CONFIDENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN L. SLAFSKY

AARON HENDELMAN WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI PC650 PAGE MILL RDPALO ALTO, CA 94304UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for secure downloading of computer applications software, secure online transactions, and secure ecommerce.ABANDONED—
036Online banking services.ABANDONED—
041Training in use of computer software and securing networks.ABANDONED—
042Custom software development; complete software installation, configuration, integration, tuning and analysis of security services; computer software consulting services.ABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 25, 2005MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 25, 2005ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 25, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 25, 2005OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Nov 15, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 9, 2004OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 28, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 8, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 8, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 31, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2003GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 29, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 31, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 31, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance