USPTO serial 78182440
ATLANTIC ASSET MANAGEMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3252850Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 19, 2007
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ATLANTIC ASSET MANAGEMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Atlantic Asset Management, L.L.C.
Stamford, CT
Atlantic Asset Management, L.L.C.
Stamford, CT
Atlantic Asset Management, L.L.C.
Stamford, CT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Janet L. Cullum
Janet L. Cullum Cooley LLP1299 Pennsylvania Ave., NWSuite 700Washington, DC 20004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Investment management services; investment advisory services; investment consultation; investment of funds for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 30, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Atlantic Asset Management, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by Atlantic Asset Management, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by Atlantic Asset Management, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named ATLANTIC ASSET MANAGEMENT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 19, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2013 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Dec 2, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | WDRL | OTQR WITHDRAWAL FROM PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 23, 2013 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2013 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2013 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2013 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| May 17, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 25, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 13, 2007 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 27, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 31, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2006 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 8, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 9, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 20, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 29, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 16, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |