USPTO serial 78182548
RAFSEC ECOTICKET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SLOAN, CYNTHIA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RAFSEC ECOTICKET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Tampere, FI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JON MICHAELSON
JON MICHAELSON ESQ COUDERT BROTHERS LLPTWO PALO ALTO SQ3000 EL CAMINO REAL 4TH FLPALO ALTO, CA 94306-2121Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on Intent to Use) Electronic resonance tags, labels and cards, with embedded resonance circuits, microchips, computer memories, radio frequency and electronic readable data carriers containing identification information for use in security and identification verification applications; and electronic data reading and data recording apparatus and instruments, namely, bar code readers and electronic readers for reading electronic resonance cards, tags, and labels for use in security and identification verification and other applications (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Electronic resonance tags, labels and cards, with embedded resonance circuits, microchips, computer memories, radio frequency and electronic readable data carriers containing identification information for use in security and identification verification applications; and electronic data reading and data recording apparatus and instruments, namely, bar code readers and electronic readers for reading electronic resonance cards, tags, and labels for use in security and identification verification and other applications | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | (Based on Intent to Use) Paper for packaging, cardboard, labels, tags and cards supplied in reels and sheets with adhesive or silicon liner (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Paper for packaging, cardboard, labels, tags and cards supplied in reels and sheets with adhesive or silicon liner | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 23, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 7, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 19, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 4, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |